Talk about education reminds
me of the first teaching. It all started as soon as a young child named Indonesia
entered kindergarten. When it was time for the drawing class, his teachers
always taught him that a mountain must be forever triangular in shape and the
sun constantly rise from its back. Furthermore, the teacher would reprimand him
if he decorated the coloring sheets passed through the drawing line. Then when
Indonesia joined elementary school (Sekolah Dasar, SD), for the first time he
was taught to read sentences. Usually the common sentences for reading
practices would be like this;
“Ini Budi; Ini
bapak Budi; Ini ibu Budi; Bapak pergi bekerja ke kantor, dan Ibu bekerja
memasak di dapur”
and if they were translated to English, the sentences
would be;
“This is Budi;
This is Budi’s father; This is Budi’s mother; Father goes to work to the office
and mother cooks in the kitchen”
In addition to describe their meaning, generally the
above sentences are followed by some images. But, the most interesting picture
is always the one which is used to portray Budi’s father and his office,
because Indonesia would spot an image of a man wearing a tie and a suit
carrying a suitcase, in a well furnished room (fully equipped with air
conditioner, telephone and a personal computer) which is used to represent his
office. I wonder what would happen for a child of a garbage man if she/he
listens to this rubbish illustration. Furthermore, the phrase “mother cooks in
the kitchen” triggers gender discrimination, internalizing Indonesia and a lot
of his friend understanding that girls (women)are only suitable for domestic
activity.
Of these explanations education
quality in Indonesia is very poor because of it’s system, fees, and human
resources. As the wrong teaching method that teacher use to their all students.
So, no wonder that today many Indonesian students memorize a formula but
never knew what the application, they also know the name of the poet and his
work but never read the works of literature let alone appreciate, they know how
to convert units of degrees Fahrenheit to degrees Celsius, but never know how
to use a thermometer, they know the term photosynthesis but never looked at it,
they memorize historical dates but it failed to learn from history, they know
about reforestation, but never even learned to plant trees and care for her.
Nevertheless,
generalization assumptions about education in Indonesia is something that has
no scientific basis. Education activities in Indonesia experienced a variety of
striking growth between rural and urban areas. The difference is the speed of
education grew strongly influenced by the level of population growth and
economic growth rates in each - each region. Areas that are now grown into
urban areas has increased the quality of education better and advanced than the
territory - territory that until now is still a rural area.
The
difference happens to be very far between, such as Jakarta and the island a
thousand, or, for example between Jakarta and parts of Papua. Therefore, in my
opinion, no one scale that can be used to generalize the education in
Indonesia. Even if it was imposed it would happen "dishonesty" in
view of Indonesia as a state entity, or maybe a kind of "selfishness"
in the name of the theory.
So
in my opinion, education in Indonesia is the world that has many advantages and
many left behind. Society also reserves the right to propose matters
of teaching in school
systems, school policies that deviate (extortion,
levy books, etc..)
Should also be
reported to the protests or
even more competent
superiors. With the active participation of society, one day, education
in Indonesia could
be more advanced. Life is education and education is
life.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar